0.06/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.13	% Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
0.12/0.34	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.12/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.34	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.34	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:10:39 EDT 2024
0.12/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.36	This is a THF_ problem
0.12/0.36	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.12/0.37	Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qaWogU2DDT/E---3.1_27648.p -m 16384 -t 180
0.12/0.39	% (27760)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_27648 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.12/0.39	% (27761)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_27648 for (1799ds/275Mi)
0.12/0.39	% (27762)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_27648 for (1799ds/18Mi)
0.12/0.39	% (27759)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_27648 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.12/0.39	% (27761)First to succeed.
0.12/0.39	% (27757)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_27648 for (1799ds/4Mi)
0.12/0.39	% (27760)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.12/0.39	% (27760)------------------------------
0.12/0.39	% (27760)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.12/0.39	% (27760)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.12/0.39	
0.12/0.39	
0.12/0.39	% (27760)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.12/0.39	% (27758)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_27648 for (1799ds/27Mi)
0.12/0.39	% (27760)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.12/0.39	% (27760)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
0.12/0.39	% (27760)------------------------------
0.12/0.39	% (27760)------------------------------
0.12/0.39	% (27759)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.12/0.39	% (27762)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.12/0.39	% (27761)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.12/0.39	% SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_27648
0.12/0.39	% SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_27648
0.12/0.39	thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
0.12/0.39	thf(type_def_6, type, b: $tType).
0.12/0.39	thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
0.12/0.39	thf(func_def_1, type, b: $tType).
0.12/0.39	thf(func_def_2, type, f: a > b).
0.12/0.39	thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: b > a).
0.12/0.39	thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: (b > a) > b).
0.12/0.39	thf(func_def_9, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.12/0.39	thf(f14,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  $false),
0.12/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f13])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f13,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ((sK1 @ sK0) != (sK1 @ sK0))),
0.12/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f12,f11])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f11,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : b] : (((f @ (sK0 @ X0)) = X0)) )),
0.12/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f8,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ! [X0 : b] : ((f @ (sK0 @ X0)) = X0)),
0.12/0.39	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f5,f7])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f7,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ! [X0 : b] : (? [X1 : a] : ((f @ X1) = X0) => ((f @ (sK0 @ X0)) = X0))),
0.12/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f5,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ! [X0 : b] : ? [X1 : a] : ((f @ X1) = X0)),
0.12/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f3,axiom,(
0.12/0.39	  ! [X2 : b] : ? [X1 : a] : ((f @ X1) = X2)),
0.12/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qaWogU2DDT/E---3.1_27648.p',fsurj)).
0.12/0.39	thf(f12,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ( ! [X0 : b > a] : (((sK1 @ X0) != (f @ (X0 @ (sK1 @ X0))))) )),
0.12/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f10,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ! [X0 : b > a] : ((sK1 @ X0) != (f @ (X0 @ (sK1 @ X0))))),
0.12/0.39	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f6,f9])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f9,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ! [X0 : b > a] : (? [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X0 @ X1)) != X1) => ((sK1 @ X0) != (f @ (X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)))))),
0.12/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f6,plain,(
0.12/0.39	  ! [X0 : b > a] : ? [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X0 @ X1)) != X1)),
0.12/0.39	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
0.12/0.39	  ~? [X0 : b > a] : ! [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X0 @ X1)) = X1)),
0.12/0.39	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
0.12/0.39	thf(f1,conjecture,(
0.12/0.39	  ? [X0 : b > a] : ! [X1 : b] : ((f @ (X0 @ X1)) = X1)),
0.12/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qaWogU2DDT/E---3.1_27648.p',invexists)).
0.12/0.39	% SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_27648
0.12/0.39	% (27761)------------------------------
0.12/0.39	% (27761)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.12/0.39	% (27761)Termination reason: Refutation
0.12/0.39	
0.12/0.39	% (27761)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.12/0.39	% (27761)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
0.12/0.39	% (27761)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
0.12/0.39	% (27761)------------------------------
0.12/0.39	% (27761)------------------------------
0.12/0.39	% (27755)Success in time 0.016 s
0.12/0.39	EOF